Thursday, May 9, 2019

›
Reneging on AB 1107 (Chu) In its original form AB 1107 was supposed to give relief to injured workers who were being wrongly denied acce...
31 comments:
Monday, April 15, 2019

WILL AB 1107 TRIM THE CLAWS OF UTILIZATION REVIEW?

›
Under current law, employers are obliged to establish Utililzation Review panels whose purpose is to review, approve, modify, or deny dia...
Wednesday, January 30, 2019

›
Duty of Care Revisited -- all is not well in Hawaii or California Duty of Care (King v. CompPartners) was reviewed in this column on 10/...
2 comments:
Wednesday, January 9, 2019

SURPRISE BILLING MAKES NEWS AGAIN

›
Under the direction of Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones the Department of Insurance has adopted new regulations intended to implement th...
Friday, November 23, 2018

BURNOUT AND THE PACIFICATION OF PHYSICIANS

›
- The "Pacification of Physicians" is the process used by insurers, adjusters, politicians, and others to take down physicians...
3 comments:
Tuesday, October 16, 2018

DUTY OF CARE VERSUS UTILIZATION REVIEW: Corrective legislation is indicated (revised from earlier article)

›
Worker's Malpractice Action Against UR Doctor Comes to an End, viz., workcompcentral, 2018-16-12. This unfortunate decision has trigger...
9 comments:
Sunday, August 26, 2018

Utilization Review Physicians Do Not Owe Injured Workers "Duty of Care"

›
That Utilization Review (UR) physicians do not owe a duty of care to injured workers can reasonably be deduced from the recent California...
12 comments: